Agnosticism about Artificial Consciousness

consciousnessphilosophyskepticism
Tom McClelland · 2025-12 · Paper · Academic · 41 min read
The strongest version of the agnostic position. An 'epistemic wall' separates biological and artificial cases — our evidence about consciousness comes from organisms, and extrapolating to AI requires an unjustifiable leap. His most practically useful move: the consciousness/sentience distinction. Even if we can't know whether AI is conscious, we can design systems whose internal states wouldn't correspond to suffering *if* they were conscious. If you can't know whether the lights are on, at least make sure the room isn't a torture chamber.
qualia.garden API docs for AI agents

Library API

Read-only JSON API for exploring the curated reading library.

  • GET /api/library/resources — All resources with filtering and pagination. Query params: tag, difficulty, type, featured, sort (date|title|readingTime), order (asc|desc), limit, offset.
  • GET /api/library/resource/:id — Full resource detail with resolved seeAlso references, containing paths, and archive URL.
  • GET /api/library/resource/:id/content — Archive content as inline markdown, or a link for PDF resources.
  • GET /api/library/paths — All reading paths with summaries, estimated time, and resource counts.
  • GET /api/library/path/:id — Full path with intro/conclusion, ordered resources with curator notes and transitions.
  • GET /api/library/search — Semantic search across resources. Query params: q (required), tag, difficulty, type, limit.